Generative Engine Optimization at Scale: Measuring Brand Visibility Across AI Search Engines

As generative AI systems replace traditional search, a new competitive dynamic has emerged where brand visibility depends on how LLMs cite, rank, and surface content rather than keyword rankings. This arXiv study measures visibility patterns across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, revealing which sources these engines prioritize and how smaller players, creators, and startups can compete against entrenched authority domains. The research addresses a structural shift in information discovery that will reshape content strategy and SEO practices across industries.
Modelwire context
Analyst takeThe more consequential finding buried in this framing isn't about SEO tactics but about concentration risk: if a handful of LLMs become the primary discovery layer for information, the citation preferences baked into those models at training time may be far harder to influence than a Google ranking signal ever was.
This connects directly to the self-preference bias work covered the same day ('Self-Preference Is Weak or Absent in Verifiable Instruction-Following Revision'). That paper found models don't systematically defend their own outputs when corrections are verifiable, but GEO raises the inverse question: do models systematically favor certain sources at inference time in ways that are neither transparent nor correctable? The self-preference study suggests LLM behavior can be more neutral than assumed in some contexts, but citation and sourcing patterns in open-ended retrieval are a different mechanism entirely, and the GEO research suggests those patterns are far from neutral.
Watch whether any of the four engines studied (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) publish or update their content sourcing guidelines within the next two quarters in direct response to GEO-style audits, which would confirm that external measurement is already creating accountability pressure on citation behavior.
Coverage we drew on
This analysis is generated by Modelwire’s editorial layer from our archive and the summary above. It is not a substitute for the original reporting. How we write it.
MentionsChatGPT · Claude · Perplexity · Gemini · Generative Engine Optimization
Modelwire Editorial
This synthesis and analysis was prepared by the Modelwire editorial team. We use advanced language models to read, ground, and connect the day’s most significant AI developments, providing original strategic context that helps practitioners and leaders stay ahead of the frontier.
Modelwire summarizes, we don’t republish. The full content lives on arxiv.org. If you’re a publisher and want a different summarization policy for your work, see our takedown page.