Use this map to find the data centers in your backyard

The more pointed issue beneath the land-use framing is opacity: data center siting decisions are being made at a scale and pace that outstrips local governments' capacity to assess them, which creates a structural information asymmetry that invites both regulatory overreach and under-regulation simultaneously.

This is largely disconnected from recent activity in our archive, as Modelwire has not yet covered the infrastructure buildout beat in depth. The story belongs to a cluster of coverage tracking how physical constraints (power, land, water) are becoming the actual bottleneck in AI scaling, a theme that sits adjacent to compute capacity and chip supply discussions but is distinctly about real-world siting politics rather than silicon.

Watch whether Oregon's state legislature or county governments in The Dalles area introduce formal disclosure requirements for data center land acquisitions within the next 12 months. If they do, Google's response (litigation, voluntary compliance, or lobbying for preemption at the federal level) will reveal how much the company views transparency as a manageable cost versus an existential risk to its siting strategy.