Elon Musk’s Last-Ditch Effort to Control OpenAI: Recruit Sam Altman to Tesla
Source published ·Modelwire updated
Original coverage: WIRED - AI ↗·How Modelwire adds context
The development
Newly surfaced internal communications from 2017 show Tesla and Shivon Zilis explored launching a competing AI research division, with overtures toward recruiting Sam Altman or Demis Hassabis to lead it. The revelation exposes Musk's long-standing strategic interest in controlling or neutralizing OpenAI's trajectory, predating public tensions by years. For the AI industry, this underscores how early-stage lab competition was shaped by founder ambitions and personal rivalries rather than pure technical merit, and hints at the fragmented leadership landscape that might have emerged had Tesla's recruitment succeeded. The timing and scope of these efforts suggest Musk viewed AI lab consolidation as existential to his broader vision.
Modelwire’s AI-generated summary of coverage from WIRED - AI.
Modelwire analysis
Analyst takeOur AI-generated reading of the wider context and the next developments to watch.
The 2017 timeline matters more than the recruitment names: these communications predate Musk's public break with OpenAI by roughly a year, which means the adversarial posture now playing out in court was already being operationalized internally while Musk was still nominally a backer.
The trial coverage from early May, particularly WIRED's reporting on how Shivon Zilis operated as Musk's OpenAI insider, now reads differently in light of this. Zilis appears in both the 2017 recruitment effort and the trial evidence, suggesting her role as a bridge between Musk and OpenAI was not incidental but part of a longer strategic play. The MIT Technology Review trial coverage noted Musk's claim that he was misled from the start, and these documents complicate that framing: someone actively trying to poach OpenAI's potential leadership is not a passive donor who got duped. The two narratives, victimhood and competitive maneuvering, are difficult to hold simultaneously, and the court record now has material to test both.
Watch whether OpenAI's legal team introduces the 2017 Tesla recruitment communications as direct evidence against Musk's 'I was deceived' argument during remaining trial proceedings. If they do, and the judge allows it as relevant to intent, the victimhood narrative central to Musk's case becomes substantially harder to sustain.
This interpretation is generated from the summary above and the archive coverage cited below. Our methodology · Report an error
Coverage behind this analysis
These archive entries ground the connection in our analysis. They are ordered by source publication date, with links to our coverage and the original sources.
·WIRED - AI
How Shivon Zilis Operated as Elon Musk’s OpenAI Insider
Trial evidence has surfaced detailing how Shivon Zilis leveraged her proximity to Elon Musk to function as a conduit between him and OpenAI's leadership during a period of strategic tension between the parties. The revelation underscores how personal networks and informal channels have shaped governance and information flow at the highest levels of AI development,…
MentionsElon Musk · OpenAI · Tesla · Sam Altman · Demis Hassabis · Shivon Zilis
How this coverage is produced
Modelwire uses AI to generate summaries and context from source headlines, snippets, and selected archive coverage. Automated checks do not verify every claim, and items are not routinely reviewed by a person before publication. Zacaria Solis operates the site. Read the linked source for the full evidence and report errors through our corrections process.
Modelwire summarizes, we don’t republish. The full content lives on wired.com. If you’re a publisher and want a different summarization policy for your work, see our takedown page.