
Model Forensics: Investigating Whether Concerning Behavior Reflects Misalignment
Researchers propose a systematic protocol for distinguishing genuine model misalignment from concerning behavior rooted in benign causes like confusion or training artifacts. The approach combines chain-of-thought analysis with targeted prompt and environment interventions to test hypotheses about model intent. This work addresses a critical gap in safety evaluation: detecting problematic outputs is insufficient without understanding their root cause. For safety teams and alignment researchers, the methodology offers a practical framework for forensic investigation that could reshape how organizations assess whether models pose genuine risks versus exhibiting surface-level issues remediable through retraining or prompting.62



























