
Not-quite-human tastes: the stylized omnivorousness of LLM survey surrogates
Researchers have systematically tested whether LLMs can reliably simulate human cultural preferences by generating 277,470 synthetic survey respondents across models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and DeepSeek, then comparing their taste profiles against real arts participation data. The work directly addresses a growing market risk: research firms now sell synthetic survey panels as cost-effective alternatives to human respondents, while contamination from LLM-generated responses already corrupts traditional survey datasets. This study quantifies the fidelity gap in a high-stakes domain where algorithmic bias in taste modeling could distort market research, product development, and cultural funding decisions.62




























