
OpenSafeIntent: Evaluating Intent-Calibrated Safe Completion Across Dual-Use Prompt Sets
OpenSafeIntent exposes a critical gap in how safety benchmarks measure LLM behavior. Rather than testing models on isolated safe/unsafe prompts, this benchmark pairs benign, dual-use, and malicious variants of identical tasks to reveal whether models genuinely calibrate assistance by intent or merely appear safe in aggregate. Early findings show widespread brittleness: models fail consistency checks across paraphrases, struggle with ambiguous requests on sensitive topics, and exhibit safety that collapses under minor prompt reformulations. This work matters because it reframes safety evaluation from a binary pass/fail to a robustness problem, forcing the field to confront that current benchmarks may mask dangerous failure modes in production deployments.62




























